<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The power of Free!</title>
	<link>http://www.26econ.com/the-power-of-free/</link>
	<description>Online economics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:43:01 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/the-power-of-free/#comment-2779</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/the-power-of-free/#comment-2779</guid>
		<description>Gabriel: Yeah, so the preference ordering depends on whether the prices are positive or zero. A zero price for one good changes the preference ordering and thus the utility function. Is that a problem ... ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gabriel: Yeah, so the preference ordering depends on whether the prices are positive or zero. A zero price for one good changes the preference ordering and thus the utility function. Is that a problem &#8230; ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gabriel</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/the-power-of-free/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Gabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 12:07:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/the-power-of-free/#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Noooo! Don't fall for it! Utility has nothing to do with "psychological boost(s)". It's just a functional representation of a preference ordering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Noooo! Don&#8217;t fall for it! Utility has nothing to do with &#8220;psychological boost(s)&#8221;. It&#8217;s just a functional representation of a preference ordering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
