<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimal number of links</title>
	<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/</link>
	<description>Online economics</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7712</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 22:22:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7712</guid>
		<description>You shouldn't have to click through to get all the content from the links.  I only needed to click on 1 of them (forgetting what Zappos was).  I feel like in including all those links, he was able to get across the same information to a wider audience.  

I imagine there's a person who may know what tinyurl is but would not much about SXSW.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You shouldn&#8217;t have to click through to get all the content from the links.  I only needed to click on 1 of them (forgetting what Zappos was).  I feel like in including all those links, he was able to get across the same information to a wider audience.  </p>
<p>I imagine there&#8217;s a person who may know what tinyurl is but would not much about SXSW.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: craige</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7506</link>
		<dc:creator>craige</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 18:02:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7506</guid>
		<description>I had absolutely no problem handling the number of links in the article. I read the article straight through first and then I went back and followed the links. Via Steve Baker's link to his own twitter page, I found this. The internet = links, links, links! It's how it works!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had absolutely no problem handling the number of links in the article. I read the article straight through first and then I went back and followed the links. Via Steve Baker&#8217;s link to his own twitter page, I found this. The internet = links, links, links! It&#8217;s how it works!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: @ggroovin</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7237</link>
		<dc:creator>@ggroovin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 19:55:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7237</guid>
		<description>Wow!  You really gave up?  If I find the content compelling, I have no problem slogging through readabilty.  Personally, I appreciated having handy access to @stevebaker's sources &#38; references.  But that's me.

Cheers &#38; Happy Friday!  =D</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  You really gave up?  If I find the content compelling, I have no problem slogging through readabilty.  Personally, I appreciated having handy access to @stevebaker&#8217;s sources &amp; references.  But that&#8217;s me.</p>
<p>Cheers &amp; Happy Friday!  =D</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonasPK</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7236</link>
		<dc:creator>JonasPK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:14:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7236</guid>
		<description>Links are a bit distracting. It's because they catch the eye and make it difficult to concentrate on the entire sentence. I follow Steve on Twitter and saw his post here. He's right, you still need to give credit where due. 

It is becoming more important now that more and more ocntent is linkable on the web. I thought superscripts may work, but that can be difficult in html, so what about parenthesis that are used arbitrarily after the word or phrase that would normally be hyperlinked. 

E.g. instead of "this article" as a hyperlink, make it "this article (*)" and just link the (*)? It doesn't break up flow or distract quite as much from the reading... 

Anyone else have input?

@jonaspk</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Links are a bit distracting. It&#8217;s because they catch the eye and make it difficult to concentrate on the entire sentence. I follow Steve on Twitter and saw his post here. He&#8217;s right, you still need to give credit where due. </p>
<p>It is becoming more important now that more and more ocntent is linkable on the web. I thought superscripts may work, but that can be difficult in html, so what about parenthesis that are used arbitrarily after the word or phrase that would normally be hyperlinked. </p>
<p>E.g. instead of &#8220;this article&#8221; as a hyperlink, make it &#8220;this article (*)&#8221; and just link the (*)? It doesn&#8217;t break up flow or distract quite as much from the reading&#8230; </p>
<p>Anyone else have input?</p>
<p>@jonaspk</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clara</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7235</link>
		<dc:creator>Clara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 17:00:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7235</guid>
		<description>This is a really good question. But maybe there would be another way to attribute the Twitter links by mentioning their user IDs the way you would normally do for people's names. If they're really interested in those people, they could probably search for them, plus you said this could all be found in Summize which links names for you.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a really good question. But maybe there would be another way to attribute the Twitter links by mentioning their user IDs the way you would normally do for people&#8217;s names. If they&#8217;re really interested in those people, they could probably search for them, plus you said this could all be found in Summize which links names for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve baker</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7234</link>
		<dc:creator>steve baker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:38:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7234</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron, Point taken on link overload. My problem was that I researched the story by asking for help on Twitter. Lots of people responded, and I wanted to cite them and lead people to their Twitter feeds. But I do see how it could get tiresome for the reader...
Steve Baker</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron, Point taken on link overload. My problem was that I researched the story by asking for help on Twitter. Lots of people responded, and I wanted to cite them and lead people to their Twitter feeds. But I do see how it could get tiresome for the reader&#8230;<br />
Steve Baker</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7233</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 16:36:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7233</guid>
		<description>I had no problem reading it at all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had no problem reading it at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7209</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 10:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7209</guid>
		<description>andy: Thanks, I've added your blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>andy: Thanks, I&#8217;ve added your blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: andy</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7201</link>
		<dc:creator>andy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 03:37:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-number-of-links/#comment-7201</guid>
		<description>Hi Aaron,

I would like to submit my site for your cool listing:

http://yellowroad.wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/

Thanks,
Andy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Aaron,</p>
<p>I would like to submit my site for your cool listing:</p>
<p><a href="http://yellowroad.wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/" rel="nofollow">http://yellowroad.wallstreetexaminer.com/blogs/</a></p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Andy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
