<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Optimal frequency of blog posts</title>
	<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/</link>
	<description>Online economics</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 08:09:31 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert Fischer</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2709</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert Fischer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2709</guid>
		<description>If you're posting more than one two two posts a day, you're really running more than one blog, and you should probably split them out.  At least offer distinct feeds.  It's extremely hard to have enough quality content on a particular topic to be worth 20~30 posts a day on a given topic: I've never seen value at that point, and I end up just unsubscribing for exactly the reasons you lay out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you&#8217;re posting more than one two two posts a day, you&#8217;re really running more than one blog, and you should probably split them out.  At least offer distinct feeds.  It&#8217;s extremely hard to have enough quality content on a particular topic to be worth 20~30 posts a day on a given topic: I&#8217;ve never seen value at that point, and I end up just unsubscribing for exactly the reasons you lay out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2699</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 12:05:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2699</guid>
		<description>Aaron, that's why I asked about higher-order equations.  Not all regressions have to be linear.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Aaron, that&#8217;s why I asked about higher-order equations.  Not all regressions have to be linear.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2696</link>
		<dc:creator>aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jan 2008 02:54:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2696</guid>
		<description>Chris: I don't think fewer = always better. That would mean that zero posts is best. The optimal number must be greater than zero.

Bill: It's 0.26. But the response scale for popularity (readers per month) was not linear, so the correlation is a bit hard to interpret I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chris: I don&#8217;t think fewer = always better. That would mean that zero posts is best. The optimal number must be greater than zero.</p>
<p>Bill: It&#8217;s 0.26. But the response scale for popularity (readers per month) was not linear, so the correlation is a bit hard to interpret I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill aka NO DooDahs!</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2693</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill aka NO DooDahs!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2693</guid>
		<description>@ Chris:  How about one post a month, whether it needs it or not?  Is that better than one every Saturday (needs it or not)?

@ Aaron:  What's the rank order correlation coefficient between popularity and activity in your survey?  Is there a 2nd or 3rd order equation that fits the data and suggests an optimal number of posts per month?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Chris:  How about one post a month, whether it needs it or not?  Is that better than one every Saturday (needs it or not)?</p>
<p>@ Aaron:  What&#8217;s the rank order correlation coefficient between popularity and activity in your survey?  Is there a 2nd or 3rd order equation that fits the data and suggests an optimal number of posts per month?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent Accounta</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent Accounta</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 23:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>I agree with you and limit my blog to 2-3 posts per day.  Never more than four.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you and limit my blog to 2-3 posts per day.  Never more than four.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Papadopoulos</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2689</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Papadopoulos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jan 2008 20:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/optimal-frequency-of-blog-posts/#comment-2689</guid>
		<description>The fewer posts published, the better.

The author can focus on fine-tuning each individual post and creating something beautiful and unique rather than becoming an echo chamber like so many blogs inevitably become.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fewer posts published, the better.</p>
<p>The author can focus on fine-tuning each individual post and creating something beautiful and unique rather than becoming an echo chamber like so many blogs inevitably become.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
