<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Interesting analysis, horrible graphs</title>
	<link>http://www.26econ.com/interesting-analysis-horrible-graphs/</link>
	<description>Online economics</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alfonso FR</title>
		<link>http://www.26econ.com/interesting-analysis-horrible-graphs/#comment-6902</link>
		<dc:creator>Alfonso FR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 May 2008 15:21:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://www.26econ.com/interesting-analysis-horrible-graphs/#comment-6902</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the graph would have been much better if: the blue (technology-trlated) series was stacked on top of the others, because looks like it is causing most of the variations.
The key in using this king of grahps is ordering series by stability: for instance, the most stable (linear) series should go below, then, the next more stable, and so on...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the graph would have been much better if: the blue (technology-trlated) series was stacked on top of the others, because looks like it is causing most of the variations.<br />
The key in using this king of grahps is ordering series by stability: for instance, the most stable (linear) series should go below, then, the next more stable, and so on&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
